Don’t count on the drunk

Ken Galinger recently wrote a column where he admits that “bartenders that overserves” alcohol are legally and ethically responisble to stop serving when the customer has too much alcohol, “and overserving is negligence”. But Galinger passes the buck to the drunken customer who doesn’t just say no when the bartender pushes another round and or more for the road. Intoxicated people cannot make good judgements, that’s why they are called “impaired”. The bartender knows how many drinks were sold, knows the symptoms of alcohol overdose. Bartenders cite and abet overdrinking should be fired, and liquor licenses should be suspended.

Doris Aiken, RID President

 

 

RID Founder Featured in History Book

RID founder featured in history book
Thursday, February 23, 2012
By Carl Strock (Contact)
Gazette Reporter



Text Size: A | A | A
I’m happy to see the good work of Schenectady’s own Doris Aiken featured in the recent book “One for the Road: Drunk Driving Since 1900,” by a medical historian at Columbia University, Barron H. Lerner.

Doris Aiken, in case you have forgotten, founded RID — Remove Intoxicated Drivers — back in 1978 and did as much as anyone in the country to raise awareness of drunk driving and more importantly to do something about it.

She lobbied, she agitated, she campaigned, and within RID’s first few years she had prevailed on the state Legislature to pass 13 bills aimed at deterring drunk driving, including a ban on plea bargaining, and as a result, alcohol-related traffic deaths dropped 23 percent, meaning 6,250 people lived who otherwise would have died.

It was the beginning of a national movement against drunk driving, and a heady time it was, if you remember. It meant really a change in national consciousness.

If you watch movies from the 1950s and 1940s, as I sometimes do, you’ll see that everyone in them drinks all the time and it’s considered perfectly normal. A sultry client enters the office of a private-eye at 10 in the morning, and the first question is, “Have a drink?” and the drink is already being poured before the question is answered.

Drinking up to and including drunkeness used to be cool, and having a hangover was evidence of sophisticated living, which you may not know if you came of age since 1980. That’s when RID got roaring and when other similar organizations like MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) and SADD (Students Against Drunk Driving) also got going, and when drinking, or at least drunkenness, became somewhat less than cool. That’s when it became criminally irresponsible if you coupled it with driving a motor vehicle.

“One for the Road” chronicles all of this, including the disagreements and rifts within the anti-DWI movement.

The alcohol industry and the advertising industry that lived off it did their best to buy off the movement, and for a time succeeded with both MADD and SADD, giving large sums of money to both and seeing to it that they kept their focus on the aberrant behavior of the drunk driver rather than on the marketing of alcohol itself.

Anheuser-Busch was pretty soon paying the salary of MADD’s executive director and eventually contributed an estimated $850,000 over a five-year period to SADD. The industry’s newly sensitive slogan became “drink responsibly,” and it didn’t take a marketing genius to see that the first half of that message was “drink.”

Doris Aiken, bless her heart, accepted no alcohol-industry money, and as result says she became persona non grata in the national broadcast world, beholden to the advertising industry, in turn beholden to the alcohol industry. National television appearances were canceled, and interviews fell off.

MADD became the big national anti-DWI name, and RID receded as far as public profile went.

Indeed this new book quotes the then-head of the National Association of Broadcasters as saying, “As long as they’re on Capitol Hill trying to get rid of beer and wine ads, we’re not going to be very friendly.”

So this became a battle not so much between drunk drivers and non-drunk drivers — indeed, who was going to defend drunk drivers? — as a battle between those who put the focus solely on drunk drivers (MADD) and those who broadened the focus to include the alcohol and advertising industries (RID).

It was quite a turn of events when the two most prominent figures in MADD, happily accepting alcohol industry contributions, both finally went to work flat-out for the alcohol industry — Cindi Lamb for the National Beer Wholesalers’ Association, and Candy Lightner for a public relations firm that represented the American Beverage Institute.

Doris Aiken tells me the book is “very accurate but doesn’t go far enough,” either in detailing RID’s accomplishments or in explaining the backballing of the organization.

Maybe not, but it’s still an engaging story, and of course there is much more to it than I have summarized.

It is a chronicle of a grass-roots movement that started in Schenectady and really did change cultural attitudes, and also of corporate efforts to dilute it for the sake of continuing profits. It’s a story that has not yet completely played out and may never completely play out.

Alcohol Bingeing Likely Cause of Student Drowning Deaths In Wisconsin

The story about the death of Michael Philbin

(21) by drowning in the icy Tor River near

Oshkock, WI us very similiar to other deaths

of 7 students since 1997 in Wisconsin after

drinking events and parties who wndered off

intoxicated, fell into neqrby lakes and rivers,

drowning.

The blood alcohol levels of these students

were not automatically made public. The

town meeting attendies in La Cross, WI

following these annual deaths believed the

police should identify or arrest the “serial”

killer responsible for these tragic deaths.

The police knew the cause of death and

recommended the town erect a fence along

the river’s death scenes.

The town refused that recommendation

infavor of the “serial killer” explaination. How

many more deaths must we accept in silence,

rather than publish the needed information

about the effects of alcohol binge drinking

on and near water and outdoor cold?

Education begins with information, the public

announcement of the BAC of those who

drowned must be a legal demand along with

public instruction in college newspapers and

local news reporting. Many parents try to

withhold the basic information to protect a

negative public image of their lost children

as reckless behavior. These children just

didn’t know the side effect of mixing swm-

ming with a high BACs is often death.

Drunk-driving quota

Drunk-driving quota case may lead to similar efforts elsewhere

Prosecutors look at possible appeal as defense lawyers suspect issue may affect other cases

January 06, 2012|By Andrea F. Siegel, The Baltimore Sun
Even as prosecutors weigh an appeal of a Howard County judge’s decision to throw out drunken-driving charges and rule that they were tied to illegal citation quotas, defense lawyers are considering whether the same defense might apply to past or current cases.District Court Judge Sue-Ellen Hantman’s ruling in a case against an Ellicott City woman has raised questions on both sides — as well as eyebrows around the legal community.

Leonard Stamm, a Prince George’s County lawyer who wrote a legal handbook called “Maryland DUI Law,” said the case puts lawyers who defend people charged with drunken driving on notice for a potential avenue for defense.Though as a District Court ruling it has no bearing on other cases, defendants coming before other judges can bring it up. “Now that it’s out there, it’s something you have to look for,” Stamm said.

Hantman said the charges against Katie Majorie Quackenbush, 22, were linked to an illegal quota — a ruling based on a memorandum that police have said was intended to describe the requirements of a federal grant that paid overtime for officers to target drunken and aggressive drivers through “saturation patrols.”

“I find any evidence in this case to be inadmissible,” she said, according to a recording of her Thursday ruling, and that ended the prosecution. Nevertheless, the judge indicated that “I don’t think saturation patrols are in and of themselves illegal, merely the quotas.”

Howard County Deputy State’s Attorney Mary V. Murphy said she doubted there were more than a fewunresolved drunken-driving cases stemming from the saturation patrols that were tied to the internal memo. Her office is looking into appeal options.

Still, she said any new potential defense sparks a flurry of activity from the defense bar. Quotas are illegal in Maryland, Murphy said, as is judging officers’ work by whether they have met them

Scott Athen, an attorney who does a lot of drunken-driving defense work in Howard, said he hadn’t heard of the issue before Thursday’s case. He said he expects attorneys will look for this as a possible defense not only in the county but probably beyond, because other areas receive grant money to fund similar drunken-driving patrols.

“I’m actually considering going back and looking through my files and seeing if there’s anything I can do to possibly reopen some cases,” he said.

This is the first time lawyers and police can recall that a judge threw out a criminal case based on such a document. The driver’s attorney, Mark Muffoletto, subpoenaed the police memos that became the linchpin of his case.

“I have at least two other cases that stem from the same email and citations and saturation patrol,” he said.

He said the woman’s blood-alcohol content registered 0.17 percent, more than twice the legal limit. More information about the grant-funded saturation patrols was not immediately available from county police Friday.

The officer was working on overtime funded by a federal grant to target drunken and aggressive drivers, he said.The police chief said a memo to officers that called for two to four citations per hour contained, “in retrospect, not the best wording,” and conceded that he “could see how it could be misinterpreted.” He said the department does not use quotas and had revised the memo.

The memo also told the officers on the drunken-driving and aggressive-driving saturation patrols that they usually produce “at or above these amounts.”

The federal funds come from the National Traffic Safety Administration to the state, according to Buel Young, a spokesman for the state Motor Vehicle Administration. Jurisdictions can apply for them.

“We stand side by side with Chief McMahon and Howard County police in verifying that there are no quotas associated with or are prerequisites for the use of NHTSA highway safety funding,” Young said.

andrea.siegel@baltsun.com

LONG LIVE RID

        There was a rumor circulating that RID-USA is dead. No one in RID knew they died. The obituary is premature.

Doris and Jane Aiken made their way to Hauppage, NY on Long Island this Fall to attend the Traffic Safety Conference put on by the New York State STOP-DWI commission. Several surprised looks on the faces of individuals who knew Doris well confirmned that the rumor had spread widely. Doris gave an energizing workshop on the effectiveness of vicitm impact panels based on mulitple stattistical measures she collected over the past five years. Her workshop and presentation was the first analysis of victim impact panels and was well received.

The truth is that RID-USA has enjoyed a productive year in 2011. The new website is up and running – RID-USA.org – an important resource for information and materials on drunken driving.

There you will find Dr. Barron Lerner’s new book entilted, “One for the Road”. This remarkable book is the first complete and accurate history of the fight against drunk driving since it became a health hazzard decades ago. You can learn more about the book on the RID website.

Far from dead, RID has also initiated a new network of volunteer counselors to help victims empower themselves with vital information. RID’s intention is to provide tools and supprt so that citizens know their legal rights and local officials who accountable for enforcing safety laws.  We aim to provide ongoing news and updates on drunken driving issues, as well as materials to order, so anyone who is concerned will find what they need to make an impact.